Restoration Challenge 017: Baby Cheryl

Old or damaged photos are posted for restoration.

Moderator: Sandra

Restoration Challenge 017: Baby Cheryl

Postby phyllis stewart on Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:29 am

IF YOU ARE NEW, please click here for information on using this forum.

Restoration Challenge 017: Baby Cheryl

Download the original photo to your hard drive by clicking on the link under the thumbnail photo below.

Image
http://www.pbase.com/image/32396819/original

Thanks to Rob Carter for contributing this baby pic of his Cheryl. Actually it doesn’t really need much in the way of “restoration” but rather suffers from a focus problem. This one is a real challenge, I’m sure you’ll agree, but let’s see what can be done with it.

If you’d like to add color to help bring out some missing detail, here is how it should look:

Fair curly hair
Bright blue eyes
Medium blue jacket
Light blue frock
Blue shoes
White socks
White shawl
Plain background


LEGAL NOTE
This photo not to be distributed or used for any purpose other than this challenge.

Attached are Cheryl's eyes, from a much later photo, of course. But, since eyes never change, only the skin around them, these will be accurate.
Attachments
cheryl-eyes.jpg
Last edited by phyllis stewart on Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby phyllis stewart on Fri Aug 13, 2004 5:52 am

I have added Cheryl's eyes to the challenge to make that part easier. You might layer them over at a reduced opacity, after making them "look to the side" a bit more with some PS or PSP magic tricks!

I just installed Optipix, a rather costly program that does a lot in the area of sharpening, among other things. I am hoping it will help on this pic. But I have two outside orders to finish by Sunday right now, so I haven't tried this challenge yet. Hope some of our restoration specialists will give it a shot!
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Forensic Restoration

Postby Twerpy on Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:00 pm

Phyllis, this one was murder.
To me there are few harder restorations
than out of focus ones like this. :-({|=
I usually tuck my tail between my legs
and run the other way when I see one like this. :sofahide:

At 200 magnification I couldn’t see any retrievable detail
in the eye and mouth area. I don’t think any focus fixing
program can work on this photo, just not enough usable detail.

I used multiply twice on the dress, jacket and blown out areas.
This enhanced some faded detail. Then came selections and coloring.
Also did a lot of dodging and burning.
The face is still indistinct and blurred. Short of drawing new eyes and
mouth I couldn’t get sharper facial features.

Hope it’s ok, at least it’s colorful.
Matt
Attachments
murder2.jpg
User avatar
Twerpy
Innmate
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:53 am
Location: Australia

Postby Vikki Hansen on Mon Aug 16, 2004 9:16 pm

Have to agree, out of focus is almost, if not impossible, to fix.
There is some detail in the eyes and mouth (I'm pretty sure the baby has teeth), but the image looked too strange when those where enhanced and brought out. I think that is due to the heavy shadows.
Also interesting, when experimenting with heavy sharpening in Neat Image, the baby looks like she's crying!
Anyway, here's a colored version, for what it's worth. Image
http://www.pbase.com/image/32658757/original.jpg
I also have the full version.
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep... S. Adams http://www.pbase.com/vhansen
http://www.lifetimephoto.com
User avatar
Vikki Hansen
Moderator
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 5:53 am
Location: Western New York

Postby PBru on Wed Aug 18, 2004 8:49 pm

who asked for refocus black magic ? :cheesy:
this is just a test. it need to be reworked a lot.

Pierre.
Attachments
before-after.jpg
User avatar
PBru
Innmate
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 5:27 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

Postby Tyeise on Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:06 am

Ok Pierre - what's the secret formula you used for your black magic? :-)
User avatar
Tyeise
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:29 am
Location: Rhode Island

Postby PBru on Thu Aug 19, 2004 7:47 am

the formula is not mine :roll: it's Optipix's one.
I downloaded the demo plugin a while ago but never tested it. as Phyllis talked about it, I gave it a try...

Pierre.
User avatar
PBru
Innmate
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 5:27 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

Postby Tyeise on Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:18 am

Wow - it sure did a great job on this picture! Thanks for the info.
User avatar
Tyeise
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:29 am
Location: Rhode Island

Postby PBru on Thu Aug 19, 2004 2:31 pm

found that mighty refocusing tool on the 'net. the only problem is that it only runs under MATLAB :(

Pierre.
User avatar
PBru
Innmate
 
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2003 5:27 pm
Location: Toulouse, France

Postby phyllis stewart on Fri Aug 20, 2004 1:43 am

Matt and Vikki, colorization REALLY helped a lot here! Nice work!

Pierre, I too tried Optipix on it and got a lot of improvement I think. I also gently layered in some new eyes...just a hint. That helped define the face a lot. I have yet to add color...just wish I had more TIME...grrr! I am soooo bizzzzzy right now...no time to play. :( But I WILL get to it...maybe next month.
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Re: Restoration Challenge 017: Baby Cheryl

Postby Gisela on Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:17 pm

My try with baby Cheryl lovely baby but I had big problems trying to focus the photos. I played about with sharpen, curves, levels, then colourized the photos it's still blur but I did not want to mess up anymore with it. That was a hard one to tackle.

http://www.pbase.com/mstmart/image/121803698
Attachments
ret 017smaller.jpg
Gisela
Member
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:32 am
Location: London UK

Re: Restoration Challenge 017: Baby Cheryl

Postby phyllis stewart on Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:36 am

Gisela, wonderful work! The coloring on the grass and shrubbery is well done and natural, as well as the coloring and increased sharpness on the baby. :bravo:
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago


Return to Restoration Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest