Smudge Painting Basics

Read tutorials on methods of turning photos into art.

Smudge Painting Basics

Postby phyllis stewart on Sun Jun 22, 2003 7:52 am

See some samples of smudge paintings in the links below. Click thumbnail to enlarge.To see the original photos from which these were made, just click the link that is right under the open pbase image. You'll notice that many of them look very different! :o

Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image
Image Image Image Image Image
These were all done in Photoshop with the smudge tool (a few have backgrounds made with PS art history brush). Smudging is really pretty easy... just takes some practice.

To smudge paint in PS, here's what you do.

Before starting, you will want to adjust the tone and color of the image. If you don't want to work too hard, autolevels faded back a bit is usually helpful. For duller less contrasty photos, it's a good idea to use a fairly strong USM to pull out color and contrast...depends on the image. Setthe top slider to 400+ and adjust the middle slider farther and farther out till you get good contrast separation without extreme black areas. Go beyond "sharp" since that's not the goal here.

Working on a dupe, as usual, choose the smudge tool and the soft brush or Linda's smudge brush, and for hair/fur choose one of Sarsa's hair brushesor a brush with some "bite" to it, such as dry brush, spatter, stipple, rough round bristle, etc. (The brushes I prefer are shown in the attachment below.) If you want a smoother look, use charcoal or chalk, etc., or use more repeated strokes and vary brush size and opacity in your painting. You can mix brushes too, for different parts of the picture.

Photoshop's "dashed circle 2" is a good choice for swirling backgrounds, as well as doing the whole picture when a smaller brush is used--I did all of Opie in photo art challenge #001 with just this circle brush. And I used a larger one on Bubba's JT for a quick and deliberately messy result. Experiment with using different brushes, and if you get a good new effect, be sure to let us know!

Brush size will depend on the size and resolution of your image, so experiment a bit before deciding on a general size range that works well for you in that size, and make a note of these combinations of image size + brush size to help you get started on future pics.

Set brush opacity between 20-50% for skin and 75-85% for hair. Set the brush mode to normal or lighten or darken, depending on the area you are painting. Separating the lights and darks gives a less smeary effect in the end and sharper hairs, etc., though on large flat areas it tends to leave white or black specks, which can be touched up with the opposite setting or a bit of normal. Experiment with the three modes to see the differences yourself, then choose the one which gives the best effect on your image.

Do background first, then outer subject areas such as clothing, followed by the face in the case of a portrait. Use a narrow brush to define edges and shadows. Whether human or animal, you will want to do the hair last.

It's helpful, but not always necessary, to put the person or animal on a separate layer. The edges of your selection when removing subject from background don't need to be perfect on the hair areas since you'll smudge that out and over later... same for all edges to some degree.

For large areas with little detail, you can "scrub" the brush...this works great if you are using lighten and darken modes. If scrubbing in normal mode, lower opacity a bit to avoid over-smearing. Scrub in a back and forth motion, changing direction as the picture itself changes direction, following the main outlines of the pic.

Eyes: On people, use a small brush for eyes, of course, alternating between lighten and darken settings for different parts of eye. Put eyelashes on by drawing dark eyeliner with a tiny brush, then brush out in a curve from the dark line with tiny brush set to darken or normal mode. Use very high opacity, but never 100%... keep the lashes looking natural. You can use the smudge brush like this to add eyelashes on any photo touch up, not just when smudge painting a picture.

Save the hair areas for last. This is the fun part! Don't scrub on hair, but pull smoothly and quickly to follow the shape of the hair. Pull out and away to blend the hair over the background. Keep your undo button handy... some strokes will go astray! Switch darken or lighten mode to blend in washed out or overly dark areas, pulling from dark to light or vice versa.

After smudging the whole picture, adjust levels and color, then use a burn tool set to shadows on areas you want to accent more as "lines", such as grooves between hair smudges where contrast wasn't sufficient. A dodge tool set to "highlights" can be used as well to add sparkle and highlights and increasing contrast locally to define hair etc. Alternatively, you may paint in overlay mode with black to darken and white to add highlights.

For final tweaking, I recommend unsharp mask to bring out the texture of the strokes in hair etc, but I do the sharpening on a second layer, so I can erase away the parts I don't want to be so sharp, using a large low-medium opacity eraser. Some of the pics above that have sharper lines were done with USM and anisotropic diffuse. To learn more about this addition to smudging, see the tute called Smooth Portraits and Fine Edges.

Each picture is different. Sometimes you want a hard look, sometimes a soft look... basically sharpening is good for creating a harder look with more defined edges.

As a final step, you'll want to run a large fuzzy dodge tool set to highlights with low opacity over appropriate parts of the image to give it energy! To find these highlighted areas if they are hard to see, try adjustment>threshold and darken to heavy black to see the areas that remain white. Those are the dodging areas. Opposite, of course, to find any areas that need some burning.

Here's a tip on bringing out the strokes of your smudge:
viewtopic.php?p=89695#89695
_______________________________________________

I'm sure :blueexclaim: I'm not the first person to think of painting with the smudge tool, but I stumbled on the :blueidea: idea working on a face over at RTP years ago, and Amanda Adams gave it the name "smudge painting" and we've called it that ever since.

The pictures below are "before and after," showing how the smudge technique affected the photo.
Attachments
brushpics.jpg
smudge.before-after.jpg
smudgegirl.BEF-AFT.jpg
Last edited by phyllis stewart on Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:14 am, edited 61 times in total.
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Nice tutorial

Postby ugot2bkdng on Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:37 pm

Great tutorial Phyllis. Lots of nice tips here. I will try it on my new flower picture once you post it. :)

chuck
User avatar
ugot2bkdng
Moderator
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 5:59 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Postby spinnnz on Sun Jun 22, 2003 10:20 pm

Phyllis, I just tried your tutorial, thanks for posting. I tend to have a hard time getting the results I want with the smudge technique, you offered a bunch of great tips.
-Lisa
Image

"Life is complicated with its if's and and's and but's It's alright to be crazy, just don't let it drive you nuts." -JB
User avatar
spinnnz
Innmate
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 2:55 am
Location: North of Boston

Postby ArtistColumbus on Sun Jun 22, 2003 11:16 pm

Phyllis, did I mention that I think what you did on these horses is amazing!?! (You need a little bowing emoticon for me to add about 20 or 30 times!) =D>
Jennifer
.............................................
You might as well laugh at yourself once in a while; everybody else does.
User avatar
ArtistColumbus
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:51 am
Location: Blacklick, Ohio

Postby phyllis stewart on Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:16 pm

Thanks, guys. :)

ArtistColumbus wrote:You need a little bowing emoticon


Good idea. I can use it when I comment on your posts!
How about sending Nightblade (Matt) a PM asking him to get one? He's in charge of that. Thanks.

Phyllis
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby BigAl on Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:17 pm

For large areas with little detail, you can "scrub" the brush...


Phyllis, for a dummy like me, could you please expand on what you mean by scrub :-k :puzzled:

After seeing your spotlight on Amanda's work, I'm quite keen to give this a bash in PSP
User avatar
BigAl
Innmate
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 8:19 am
Location: South Africa

Postby themanda on Sun Jul 13, 2003 3:38 pm

BigAl--most of the time, you go over areas in single, stroke like motions with your smudge tool. Sometimes, though, that will leave too distinct of a mark, even with a low opacity setting. (round areas like cheeks or chins are the worst areas for me, personally) So to break the edges, you might find yourself "scrubbing" by keeping the pressure on your mouse/stylus and making more than one directional stroke at a time. Literally scrubbing your tool on the image like you would a sponge on a pan.

Is this what it means to you, Phyllis? We've got fairly distinctive styles, even with the same technique. :) Funny how that works.
amanda
User avatar
themanda
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 3:56 am

Postby phyllis stewart on Sun Jul 13, 2003 9:24 pm

Yes, Amanda, just holding down the pen/button and moving the pen/mouse around in all directions to cover an area. As you say, just like scrubbing with a sponge...evidently Al doesn't do much housework! :cheesy:

Phyllis
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby themanda on Mon Jul 14, 2003 4:17 am

I generally use a chalk brush setting on my smudgies. It gives a nice soft finish and smudges out well into the outer boundaries of your original. I find it especially good on hair. :) If I want more structure, I like to use a splatter brush with more scattering. It picks up smaller sections and doesn't smear them together so much.

In fact, I find that if you use a harder brush and follow it with "other/custom" and a lot of USM you can duplicate a pastel chalk feeling very well with the smudge technique. And this is a very good technique for simulating oil paintings, of course.

There's a lot of versatility to be found based on the type of brush, the length of your stroke, and the level of opacity.

It's too much fun!
amanda
User avatar
themanda
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 3:56 am

Postby phyllis stewart on Mon Jul 14, 2003 4:52 am

themanda wrote:In fact, I find that if you use a harder brush and follow it with "other/custom" and a lot of USM you can duplicate a pastel chalk feeling very well with the smudge technique.


Do you mean to apply the filter other/custom and USM after you've smudged the pic?

What number settings do you use for other/custom?

Is this done starting with a chalk brush...or which?

Do you have a little example patch you could show us?

Phyllis
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby themanda on Mon Jul 14, 2003 1:55 pm

I don't have one now, but I can whip one up! :) I'll take notes of what I do so I can post the full description.
amanda
User avatar
themanda
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 3:56 am

Simulating Pastel Chalk with the Smudge Tool

Postby themanda on Mon Jul 14, 2003 2:29 pm

Okay, here is a mini tut on how to get a chalk pastel look with the smudge tool in just a few steps.

1. Chose a very textured brush to begin with. For this, I used a spatter brush at 24 pixels, 57% opacity. Smudge the image as you normally would.

2. USM--amount 76, radius 8, threshold 0

3. Custom>Other--keep all settings at the PS preset (-1, -1, 5, -1, -1)

4. USM--same settings as before

5. You may want do to another pass at Custom>Other, but probably not at full strength. Fade the effect to suit your own tastes.

6. Addition of sandstone or art paper filter is a nice way to finish the effect.
Attachments
progressivechalkcat.jpg
chalkcat.jpg
amanda
User avatar
themanda
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 3:56 am

Postby phyllis stewart on Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:04 pm

That looks really good... And just a few extra steps! Great idea!
Thank you so much for taking the time to show us how. :kiss:

Phyllis
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby BigAl on Mon Jul 14, 2003 5:13 pm

That is stunning Amanda, I'll have to play around with this technique :thumbsup:
User avatar
BigAl
Innmate
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 8:19 am
Location: South Africa

Postby kaiman on Mon Jul 14, 2003 5:44 pm

Amanda, great step by step pix, way to go. thanks for letting us know your technique . I O U 1. :D
Phyllis, Golden Girl is one of the photo paintings that most impressed me visually and then emotionally, I saw it the first time in Retouch Pro forum a little while ago and always remembered that one as one of the best. Great job !! :bigthumb:
----
Kman
User avatar
kaiman
Moderator
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 2:56 am
Location: 25n45, 108w57, Mex./former AZ-USA

Postby ArtistColumbus on Tue Jul 15, 2003 2:06 pm

Amanda, thanks for telling about the extra steps! :mrgreen: I can't wait to try them out myself!
Jennifer
.............................................
You might as well laugh at yourself once in a while; everybody else does.
User avatar
ArtistColumbus
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:51 am
Location: Blacklick, Ohio

Postby Crone on Thu Jul 17, 2003 11:08 pm

Okay Smudgee question....

When you have say a cat against a white background, with white whiskers - how do you smudge with some definition in those areas?

My problem is I have a cat that is tabbie - her whiskers are against her body in the photo, but I wanted to do just a head and neck portrait of her, which means loosing the body and subsiquetly her whiskers background. I have tried grabbing just the whiskers but they allways seem to dark even after lightening them............any sugestions?

Thanks in advance :cheesy:
User avatar
Crone
Moderator
 
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Bexhill, UK

Postby phyllis stewart on Fri Jul 18, 2003 9:36 am

Clare, it would help if you'd post the picture so we could see exactly how the whiskers look against the tabby fur. In general, you don't have to smudge whiskers at all, so they can remain fine. See a photo of the steps in this thread on making whiskers show up on smudge paintings.

With a dark background you can take this a step further and use the dodge tool set to highlights to give them even more contrast against the background so you can "grab" them more cleanly. Don't know if it would work... might not be able to pick up the whiskers for a separate layer. In which case, try drawing them and turning them white.

When you get the whiskers in place and they are very light, add a tiny drop shadow under them in a shade of gray to separate them from background. This is what you do to use white type on a yellow background, for example, and it lets the light type show up while making the letters easy to see and read.

Well, it was the first solution that came to mind since I make a lot of items with type on pictures...might not work with whiskers though. :roll:

Phyllis
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby Crone on Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:10 pm

Thanks Phyllis I will give this a go. I think the drawing in new whiskers might be the best solution as I really didn't want all the cat. She was sitting looking back over her shoulder and may look a little bit deformed if I leave it all there. I haven't touched the whiskers the other side and they look good - i'll post the image once I've had a quick go at this

thanks again

The Crone
User avatar
Crone
Moderator
 
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Bexhill, UK

Postby Crone on Fri Jul 18, 2003 3:59 pm

Here we are again, I have encluded a before and after of Oscar, The after has at the moment got two sets of whiskers the top are the before and the bottom ones are the after. Hes what I did, any suggestions to make this better would be appreciated, thanks.

drew in the whiskers in white
Filter - find edges
Filter - G/blur 3.5
smudge
Amanda's filter USM Custom and USM
made a mask layer and lowers the opacity of the whiskers

I also made the background sandstone with a 1.5 g/blur
Attachments
Oscar.jpg
Copyright C.Sadler, 2003
Oscar-before.jpg
Copyright C.Sadler, 2003
User avatar
Crone
Moderator
 
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Bexhill, UK

Postby Tyeise on Fri Jul 18, 2003 8:21 pm

I think you did a real nice job!

Tyeise
User avatar
Tyeise
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 5065
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:29 am
Location: Rhode Island

Postby themanda on Fri Jul 18, 2003 9:36 pm

yes, clare you did a good job. however, i find the flea collar a little distracting. on the dog pic, the collar helps to finish off the bottom edge, but on this one it's creating too harsh of a line without defining any particular area. does that make sense? i probably would have either lightened it considerably before doing the smudge, or cloned it out entirely.
amanda
User avatar
themanda
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 3:56 am

Postby phyllis stewart on Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:09 pm

I can't decide about the collar. I didn't mind it until Amanda mentioned it, but, still, I think it looks okay...like jewelry perhaps...not really distracting.

I do think the white whiskers look wrong since the eyebrows are dark against the white background...perhaps the whiskers should be too?

Overall, however, it's a great job. I really like your fine delicate smudge strokes...great technique! Want to share your brush and size choices?

Phyllis
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby Crone on Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:33 pm

Thanks All,

I did think that there was something distracting about the image, and just automatically put it down to the whiskers being the wrong colour, but now you have pointed out the colar - its like its waving a flag..... sometimes you can just stare and stare and see nothing, thanks for being extra fresh sets of eyes. I will lighten it and see whether it is still to intrusive - watch this space

As for the size of my brush I normally don't really look at the size, I just make it a little bit bigger than a hair on the image. I think this one was around about 20 but it depends on the size of the image. I also set it to anything between 49-65 depending on where I am smudging. The brush is chalk 36 with spacing of 5.

Thanks again

Crone
User avatar
Crone
Moderator
 
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Bexhill, UK

Postby phyllis stewart on Fri Jul 18, 2003 11:54 pm

This is what I meant about using dodge tool to lift the whiskers off the fur...it worked rather well on this image because the fur was a good contrast. (Forgive sloppy job adding white, but just needed enough to show whiskers.)

I think if the whiskers are darker against a pure white background it would look more natural than white against a gray background...based on how the eyebrows are.

And, looking at it again, I vote YES for the collar...adds some color and interest to a small pic without much in it...not that your kittykat isn't gorgeous on her own! I just like the collar.

Just my two cents.

Phyllis
Attachments
catwhiskers.jpg
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Re: Smudge Painting: Photoshop

Postby tatabu on Sat Sep 24, 2005 8:43 am

Phyllis,

Is the brush size for hair in your "Smudge" tutorial usually very small?
Is it, e.g., of 1-5 pixels diameter? I used to paint with the art history brush using such small brushes.
You have done some great work with your "Smudge" method.
Thank you!

tatabu
tatabu
Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:34 pm

Postby phyllis stewart on Sat Sep 24, 2005 8:19 pm

Tatabu, hi, welcome to the Inn! :howdy:

Actually my smudge brush is usually a lot larger than that. I'd say for a pic that is 1200 pixels wide I'd use a brush about 20 pixels to 50 in most cases, except of course for eyelashes, which are done with a brush of only 1 or 2 pixels in darken mode at high opacity in the 90's to pull out lash strokes. The brush size of course depends on the size of the image you are working with, but that's a rough estimate.
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby tatabu on Sun Sep 25, 2005 3:10 am

Thank you, Phyllis. I appreciate it.

tatabu
tatabu
Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:34 pm

Postby phyllis stewart on Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:19 am

I just edited this tute to include Linda's incredible smudge brush and Sarsa's hair brushes (my own favorite hair and fur brushes are among these), along with a link to downloading them.
Phyllis
www.pbase.com/pstewart
www.innographx.com
PSCS3, Painter 9, Studio Artist, Gimpshop
---------------------
A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are for.
User avatar
phyllis stewart
Innkeeper
 
Posts: 17127
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:50 am
Location: Naperville, IL, near Chicago

Postby cat bounds on Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:43 am

Thanks, Phyllis. That horse painting above is soooooooooo gorgeous! Is it posted on PBase as a larger painting?
User avatar
cat bounds
Permanent Innmate
 
Posts: 6848
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:58 am
Location: Mid-South

Next

Return to Photo Art Tutorials

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron